So Whats that all about ?

So what's it all about?

If you've read the rest of the information presented on FMOTL.com you should have the idea that it can all be summed up in one word 'commerce'. Statute 'law' is all about commerce. And contracts. And tricking you into contracts, such that Statutes can be used against you. And to hide/disguise the fact that The Law, the Real Law, Common Law, can protect you.

If you check this link, you will see that a UK citizen is worth (to the Government) about £34 million (+) in financial terms (January, 2009). If you murder someone then Common Law will be used to try you. If found guilty the sentence imposed will be commensurate NOT with the fact that you took another person's life (because 'there's no sentiment in business') - but that you have robbed the Government of £34 million. This is because while the trial will be based on Common Law (you caused harm to another human being), the sentence, the punishment, will reflect the commercial aspects.

Now, there is a hidden problem with Statues. One that very few people realise. If you check, you will find that the Government generally tack on the possibility of a prison sentence for Statute violation. But the courts rarely use it, in practice.

Now the reason why the possibility of a prison sentence is tacked on to the violation is the psychological effect it has. "I could go to prison for that" is great psychology.

The reason why this option is - if at possible - avoided is commercial. It costs money to keep people in prison. It costs money to build them, to staff them, to furnish them, to heat them to light them, etc.

In 1993, during the Poll Tax days, the cost was £2,500 per inmate, per week.

Now you know why, having spent £19 billion to implement it, just a few thousand of us brought it to its knees by going to prison ... and saying we'll continue to go as long as the Poll Tax is on the Statute Books.

Small numbers can move mountains, if they know what they are doing.

Don't ever be afraid to point out, to all and sundry, that there is a serious cost, per inmate, to keeping people in prison. And the 'taxpayer' always has to pick up the tab.

(By the way, 65% of the prison population are there 'on remand'. In other words charged, but not had their day in court)

The majority of people think that their taxes go to fund 'something to do with the name of the tax'. For example that 'Road Tax' funds the roads, and 'Council Tax' funds local infrastructure.

They think that fines (e.g. Parking Fines, Speeding Fines, etc) go to the Government.

This is not true. Not in the sense that these monies 'stay' with the Government.

If you recall from the 'Long Arm' article, the UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION is in Chapter 11 bankruptcy. All taxes and fines collected are used to pay off the INTEREST on previous International Monetary Fund/World Bank borrowings. (Note: The interest only ... the original loans can never be paid off. Far too much has been borrowed in the past)

That's why there are so many Statutes. The Government spends its time working out ways to tax you, by fining you for - what can only be considered to be - some of the most paltry things possible. The idea is to tax you as much as practically possible - without you realising that it is just another tax.

For example, it is now a Statute violation to hold an 'unlicenced' concert in a Church Hall. OK. What harm, injury or loss does an 'unlicenced' concert cause, in a Church Hall? A very temporary small amount of noise, maybe? Considered to be 'a breach of the peace', maybe? Well, if we are talking out 'breaches of the peace', what about Police Sirens? Or even Church Bells? Or Jetliners?

The idea is utter rubbish of course. Purely designed to collect money. It is an imprisonable 'offence', but you can be sure that they will fine the organisers, not send them to prison. Fining them collects money - to pay off the IMF INTEREST demands - imprisoning the organisers spends money.

Does this explain why all Governments do the same - or very similar - things once in office? When they never repeal all the legislation passed by any previous Government? The Poll Tax was THE, LAST, ONE BIG, EXCEPTION ... but then, it was so outlandish ... it went totally beyond the pale. The Poll Tax was too big a step for the creeping Totalitarian Tiptoe. They learned from that to keep the steps a lot smaller.

'Ang on! 'Ang on! 'Ang on! Could that be why rapists and paedophiles - people the public would love to see put away for a long, long time - quite often get a sentence that amounts to a 'slap on the wrist'? Although these lowlife have absolutely ruined another human's life, they haven't - generally - robbed the Government of £34 million +! And it costs money to keep them in prison! 

And could this explain why a 'life sentence' doesn't mean life (more often than not), and why parole is so easily on offer?

Steal a loaf of bread because your children are hungry, and the next thing you know there are calls for the introduction of Sharia Law!

Follow the money.

Once a Government gets into office - irrespective of any 'policy' and all Manifesto Pledges - they are faced with finding methods to pay back the IMF INTEREST. Whatever party you vote for, they will face the same problem. And there is only one way to solve the problem (as far as they are concerned) ... and that's to tax you, somehow, in such a way that you'll only bitch about it to your next door neighbour. (Or in on-line 'Commenting', under on-line so-called 'news' articles).

In other words, in such a way that you'll always blame 'the other lot'.

Further reading and research

There are two main schools of thought about all this. The first 'school' says 'stymie/stalemate everything, don't let them even get you into court'. The second says 'all courts are commercial, and by learning the ropes, you can have a lot of fun, and even make some money'.

The first method comes down to 'Freeman-on-the-land'. The second is known as 'Commercial Redemption'. It may be possible to enjoy a mixture of the two, but that is unclear (at least to me) at this time.

Both methods require the basic understanding of the situation, as explained as explained in the 'Long Arm' article. Alternatively you can purchase the book on this subject of FMOTL

However once the idea of the legal fiction PERSON is understood, and how it is used by the Judiciary, what you do about it splits into each method.

I'll try to describe these methods in basic terms, taking them in reverse order.

Commercial Redemption

Major proponents of the Commercial Redemption Method are Mary Croft and Winston Shrout. (There may be others)

Neither of these two people have - in my humble opinion - a clue how to explain anything. (Maybe you can say the same for me, I don't know). But what I do know is that reading Mary's book is very hard going. Similarly watching Winston's seminars is very painful. Due to a number of factors:

1) They don't know how to present. Much of the information is presented in reverse. In other words the roof is described before the foundations. (In one seminar the phrase 'wet signature' was used many times before someone had the commonsense to ask 'just what that meant'. It means handwritten, not rubber-stamped, photocopied, etc). 

2) The accent (e.g. a laid-back Serthern Draaaaawl) is hard to decipher (in Winston's case)

3) It is all about the united States or Canada. Obviously there are United Kingdom equivalents, but what are they? ("So near, yet so far"?)

However, in all cases, stern warnings are always given (by these proponents): "Don't do anything at all until you know exactly what you are doing".

Basically what these people are saying is that you can take control of your legal fiction PERSON. (Actually absolute control) And, if you take control of it, you can utilise it in your favour - by learning the game, and playing the game.

Now Mary's book is free (see link above). And good for her. But all Winston's stuff costs money. So one wonders if he is so good at fleecing the courts with his Commercial Redemption, and (as he says) he enjoys it so much, then why is it not possible to do his brethren a big favour and explain it without attempting to make a fast buck? (Hmmmm)

Take that, plus the stern warnings, and the time one would spend 'knowing exactly what one was doing' and, in my case at least, I think I pass.

Do I really want to spend time going down to courtrooms and watching what goes on, just to learn the ropes? And then go out and deliberately violate Statutes to test my knowledge (some you win, some you lose, but you gain experience). Is that what you want to do with your life? Well, I've got 'better' things to do, so I think I'll pass.

And I'll add something else. Personally speaking, as human being with a soul, I utterly reject the idea that I am associated with an 'fiction'. This is simply playing the utterly corrupt New World Order Commerce 'game'. And I, personally, will have no part of it if I can possibly help it. 

Yes. I pass.

(But good luck if you decide to go down that route)

Freeman-on-the-land

Fundamentally this consists of 'having as little as possible' to do with any of the corrupt New World Order 'game'. Generally by posing unanswerable questions back to robots. This creates a wall between the Freeman and the robot, causing a stalemate. This will create confusion within the robot. I'd rather confuse a robot than extract money from him.

It also satisfies my sensibilities. The robots are, in point of fact, engaged in treason. They just don't realise it. 

Personally speaking I would rather educate these robots back into non-treasonable human beings. Back to stark reality. I don't see how stark reality can be achieved by playing within the surreal of Commerce Law. I can't see how allowing the robots their 'surreality', and going along with it, will ever teach them anything. 

But that's just my twopen'rth. (I guess I was born to rebel)

Veronica: of the Chapman family

January, 2009

What the experts say about Vaccines

Vaccines’ What is not printed on the label

The vast majority of scientists, physicians, nurses and public health educators’ trust that the ingredients in a vaccine have been individually and synergistically proven safe and effective.
The public believes these vaccines, aside from their specified virus(es), are sterile solutions, free from undesirable contaminants not listed on the manufacturer’s package inserts.
When the pediatrician injects a vaccine into the muscle of a child, the public has unquestioning faith that this is the case. In other words, we want to believe that vaccines have been generated under perfect conditions for the safety of children and ourselves.

It was reconfirmed that vaccines are “widely contaminated by viral and DNA genetic code fragments, many viruses and proteins''. There was expressed concern that these may also contain prions (tiny proteins responsible for incurable diseases and neurological disorders in both humans and animals) and oncogenes (a gene that turns normal cells into cancerous ones).

Dr. Andrew Lewis of the FDA said that a brand-new monkey-human mutant virus was created during the course of creating an adenovirus vaccine with adenvovirus-SV40 hybrid viruses. Dr. Lewis also worried that “foreign cellular DNA” common in childhood vaccines could include “viral oncogenes” capable of causing cancer.

We are entrusting these people with our well being, it seems we inicluding our children are one big genetic experiment. Do you want to play chance with you or your loved ones lives ? As this is what we have and are doing everyday.  Got that headache, do you automatically reach for the Asprin ? Change your habits!

When the question of safety is raised, response is somewhat filled with potential dangers.

The scientists presented a question to themselves as to whether or not an attenuated vaccine strain could revert into a variant virus capable of replicating so fast that it would cause AIDS. They agreed that they were unable to answer this question

On the question whether or not mutation events could occur in children after vaccination, the answer was that 

“Recombination among a variety of viruses [contaminant viruses] and cells co-infected in tissue culture is not uncommon.” What this basically means is that because it is  “not uncommon” for genetic codes of both contaminant viruses and living cells to recombine and create mutations in laboratory cultures, it can certainly occur in a child’s body after vaccination.

Dr. Hana Golding, Chief of CBER’s Laboratory of Retrovirus Research, raised the fear that although DNA fragment contaminants in vaccines may be thought to be dead, they could remain active and dangerous. This meant that the codes of these contaminants could combine in vaccines and create new mutant strains of pathogens.

Dr. Leonard Hayflick, a virologist at both Stanford and the University of California at San Francisco raised a concern that the 

common primary culture used for making vaccines with animals and bird embryos has created a situation where it is “apparent that these cells contained many unwanted viruses, some of which were lethal to humans.” This was especially worrisome of those vaccines, such as polio, which still relies on monkey kidney cells that have contributed to widespread death and illness.

One of the UK’s leading vaccine expert, Dr. Phil Minor from the National Institute of Biological Standards and Control, noted that 

some cases of polio vaccine are polluted with more monkey virus, SV40, than actual poliovirus.

 Although the uninitiated who are not informed about-closed door vaccine science have been led to assume that SV40 was no longer in polio vaccines at the time of this meeting, the conversations confirmed that it was still in use. This is another example of deception at high levels within the vaccine industrial complex and high government health officials to withhold information that directly impacts the health and well being of citizens.

Dr. Rebecca Sheets from the CBER’s laboratory responsible for monitoring vaccine safety stated the national health organizations had no control over how vaccines were made. In short, they could make recommendations but the vaccine industrial complex was free to act as it choose.

It is impossible to remove DNA contaminants from vaccines.

Although weight limits for contaminating DNA were set by the FDA as far back as 1986, vaccine makers have never been able to reach that goal. The CDC decided to limit their weight recommendation to cancerous cell lines and then increase the other DNA contamination allowance one hundred-fold.  However, these limits are only “recommendations” and, therefore, the FDA is unable to enforce them. Vaccine manufacturers continue to have the freedom to take scientific measures to reduce contaminants only if they wish.

Read more of this story here

Chemtrails and Consipracy

H.A.A.R.P

The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) is an ionospheric research program jointly funded by the US Air Force, the US Navy, the University of Alaska and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)                                          

Its purpose is to analyze the ionosphere and investigate the potential for developing ionospheric enhancement technology for radio communications and surveillance purposes.  The HAARP program operates a major Arctic facility, known as the HAARP Research Station, on an Air Force owned site near Gakona, Alaska.                                                                                               Recent article  on Weather Modifications. The head of the China Meteorological Administration assured concerned residents that the agency’s attempts to create artificial snow to ease a record drought this winter have not polluted the environment.      

The trails you are seeing are left behind from Aircraft, they are not dispersing, why would that be ?

Is it due to badly maintaned Aircraft or are they 'spraying' chemicals down on the citizens below, as they once did at Porton Down.


What they don't want you to know

  

Heavy Chemtrailing leaves scattered clouds forming. Slowly the trails dispersing enough to create a cloud canopy, it is quite common for it to rain the next day.

Here is an example after chemical spraying, there was a heavy 'Oil Spill'
left around the sun, other than 'Fuel dumping' what else can cause this strange effect ? Please see Morgellons disease for more information on this terrible unknown disease, would it have come from the chemtrails which we report on ?

It is also common to see what is refered to as a 'Chembow'. These are often described as straight rainbows, evidence of this to the picture taken to the Right, light reflecting particles, but what are the particles made up of, if we look at the refered chemicals used in previous Chemtrailing it is quite a scary prospect.!

Powered by imagination

MORGELLONS link to CHEMTRAIL

The field of 'nanotechnology' is in its infancy, and much has yet to be discovered as to how nanomaterials behave and what effects they'll have on humans and the environment. Conditions such as Morgellons Disease may be linked to this new technology.

Morgellons Disease : crawling, biting or stinging sensation on the skin, fibers, specks or granules appear unexplainedly on the skin's surface.
Black fibers that appear on the skin are made from 'nanomaterials' according to research study. One 2007 study conducted by American toxicologist Dr. Hildegarde Staninger, the fibers found on Morgellons patients are 'nanocompounds' which are typically used in bio-nano-manufacturing processes.

Nanotechnology
Nanotechnology is a field of applied science in which the smallest units of matter are manipulated to create new materials and processes. "Nano" represents a unit of measurement where one nanometer is equal to one billionth of meter. Because of their minute sizes, nanomaterials are much stronger than macro-sized materials and have different--usually stronger--chemical properties as well.

Morgellons Disease
Morgellons Disease is a skin disorder in which fibers, specks or granules appear unexplainedly on the surface of the skin. Individuals who suffer from this condition also report crawling, biting and stinging sensations. The Morgellons Research Foundation lists more than 13,000 families suffering from this condition in the United States. Little is known about the cause of the condition. Initially, the Centers for Disease Control labeled it "delusional parasitosis," as it was first considered to be the result of a mental disorder. However, the high incidence of physical symptoms in reported cases led the CDC to reclassify Morgellons as an "unexplained dermatology."
 

Nanotechnology and Morgellons
Numerous theories link nanotechnology to Morgellons Disease. Epidemiological and research studies have identified the black fibers that appear in the skin as made from nanomaterials. In March 2007, American toxicologist Dr. Hildegarde Staninger published a much publicized study in which researchers collected fiber material samples from Morgellons sufferers. Results revealed that the materials in the fibers were nanocompounds commonly used in bio-nano-manufacturing processes.

Chemtrails
Chemical spraying is cited as a possible nanotechology-related distribution method for Morgellons Disease. These sprays--also referred to as chemtrails--are said to be dispersed by jet airplanes at high altitudes. An March 7, 2001, article from USA Today cites numerous reports made across the United States regarding unusual plane-exhaust trails in the sky. Statements made by governing agencies were characterized as elusive, denying that any such phenomena existed. Activist groups opposed to biochemical warfare research identify the numerous chemtrail sightings as practice procedures carried out by military agencies. Nanocompounds are thought to play a part in the manufacture of biowarfare materials.

Food Additives
As of August 2006, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the use of a nano-engineered food additive for use as a food preservative. The additive comes in the form of a bacteriophage, which is a virus organism designed to "eat up" bacterial organisms that grow in food. Findings presented by Staninger show that the materials found in Morgellons cases are the same ones used in the manufacturing of bacteriophages. Morgellons activists are concerned that nano-engineered products and food may be the source of this disease.